Field and digital measurement
Compare field and digital acquisition with the same definitions.
A channel comparison is useful only when its costs, customers and outcomes mean the same thing. This Home Front planning worksheet separates search visibility, sales activity and provider-confirmed results. Use it to agree on a measurement method before a pilot; it is not a report of Home Front client performance.
Start with the denominator
- Program footprint
- The provider-approved set of addresses included in the program. Record its version and effective date; a changing footprint changes the meaning of a take-rate comparison.
- Order cohort
- Unique provider-accepted orders first accepted during a defined date window. Follow that original group through the observation cutoff.
- Completed installation
- An installation confirmed by the agreed provider source. Do not substitute a submitted order, booked appointment or representative estimate.
- Acquisition cost per completed installation
- All agreed acquisition costs assigned to the cohort divided by its confirmed installations at the cutoff. If there are no confirmed installations, report the ratio as unavailable and show the costs separately.
- Install conversion
- Confirmed installations from the accepted-order cohort divided by unique accepted orders in that same cohort. Keep the cohort age visible.
- Take rate
- Define the customer event and eligible premises before using this term. A current active-customer share of a fixed footprint differs from new installations during a pilot.
A worked example with a duplicated touchpoint
Illustrative numbers only. A pilot records 40 unique provider-accepted orders. Twelve of those households interacted with both a digital campaign and a field representative. At the agreed cutoff, 24 of the original 40 orders have a confirmed installation, eight remain open and eight were cancelled. Total agreed acquisition costs are $6,000.
- Unique accepted orders: 40. Adding the twelve shared touchpoints would incorrectly produce 52.
- Install conversion at the cutoff: 24 ÷ 40 = 60%.
- Acquisition cost per completed installation: $6,000 ÷ 24 = $250.
- Open orders: 8, reported separately rather than treated as installed or failed.
This example does not show which channel caused an installation, which channel deserves payment, or which program will perform better. Attribution rules and commercial terms are separate decisions.
Download the measurement worksheet
Open the CSV in your spreadsheet tool and enter aggregate program counts. It contains field definitions and an empty value column, with no customer names, addresses or account records. Agree the reporting source, cost categories, observation cutoff and responsible owner before filling it in.
- Freeze the footprint and accepted-order entry window.
- Deduplicate by the agreed provider reference in the authorized system.
- Record first, last and assisted touchpoints separately from the outcome.
- Reconcile accepted, open, installed and cancelled records at the same cutoff.
- Calculate the ratios only after their counts and cost scope are agreed.
- Review the unresolved records and decide what to repair before expanding.
Keep search and AI metrics in a separate view
Search Console impressions and clicks describe search exposure and visits. Bing AI citations describe how often content was cited in supported AI experiences. Neither dataset proves that a prospect qualified, an order was accepted or an installation completed.
Google’s Search Console performance documentation explains the search metrics. Bing’s AI Performance guidance explains citation reporting. Keep their date windows, source and scope alongside the numbers rather than merging them into a single “leads” total.
Questions for a channel review
Should assisted conversions count as additional customers?
No. An assist describes another touchpoint for the same customer. Keep it for analysis without increasing the unique customer count.
Can we compare a two-week pilot with a mature campaign?
Only with the age difference made explicit. Younger orders have had less time to reach installation or a retention checkpoint. Prefer matched entry windows and observation periods.
Does a lower cost per install prove the channel caused better results?
No. Differences in footprint, offer, customer mix, timing, costs and fulfillment can affect the result. A causal claim needs an appropriate comparison design and evidence beyond this descriptive worksheet.
Published October 31, 2026 · Home Front Solutions, LLC